From what I'm finding, if someone hijacks your property, after 30 days they have rights too. Isn't that lovely? If someone can prove that they've been on your property (that your worked your tail off to earn, by the way), then they are legally allowed to stay because they have rights. This confuses me. It's no longer trespassing just because of how long they've been committing the crime? Should they not be charged with the time that they were trespassing there before the 30 days were up? I strongly disagree. Our legal system is confused.
Confused would be putting it mildly!
ReplyDeleteYes! The thing that really bothers me is that no one sees a problem with it.
ReplyDelete